Skip to main content

Our Whitianga office is currently closed to the public due to a power outage in central Whitianga. You can still contact the council by calling 0800 800 401 or completing an online enquiry form.

Close alert

Background

Ohinemuri River discharge - discharge pointAt about 3pm on Friday, 23 August, Waikato Regional Council received its first notification of a large, orange plume flowing down Ōhinemuri River in the Karangahake Gorge.

A buildup of bright orange sediment had discharged from a mine shaft entrance, down a steep drop and into a stream that feeds into the Ōhinemuri River near the Karangahake Gorge car park.

Waikato Regional Council is responsible for investigating how the sediment came to be discharged into the river, and the impacts on the river and environment. The Department of Conservation administers the land.

There is high public interest in this incident and a lot of demand from the public and media for information. This webpage has been set up to keep people up to date with what has been done so far and to provide answers to the frequently asked questions being directed at staff or posted on social media.

What we've done 

  • Image - Ohinemuri River discharge - water samplingOn Friday, 23 August, staff measured the pH and dissolved oxygen levels of the orange water with a handheld water monitoring system. The instant results deemed the results were within normal levels for those two measures.
  • A fly over was also made of the Ōhinemuri that same day to assess the situation, and again over the Firth of Thames on Saturday, 24 August, about midday. The plume was spotted at Mackytown on the Friday and was estimated by staff to reach the Firth of Thames between 0930 and 1030 on the Saturday. There were no obvious sightings of the orange sediment in the Firth of Thames during Saturday’s flight.
  • Waikato Regional Council got in contact with the Department of Conservation, Hauraki District Council, Forestry groups operating in the area, the Coromandel Marine Farmers’ Association, Civil Defence Emergency Management, the Waikato DHB, iwi and mining experts from the area as soon as it was alerted of the incident.
  • Our science team advised that if the sediment was from historic mining assets, it could contain residual cyanide and heavy metals.
  • Downstream water-take users (the majority are irrigation) were identified and all pumps were turned off.
  • The Coromandel Marine Farmers’ Association was alerted to the council’s estimations of the plume reaching the Firth of Thames.
  • Photos from the public and Hauraki District Council helped determine the source of the sediment, which was confirmed by council staff on the morning of 24 August.
  • Water and solid samples for analysis were taken on 23, 24 and 26 August.
  • The results from samples have been analysed.
  • Council staff are completing a thorough examination to try and determine how the event occurred, what a “normal” discharge from the mine should look like, how much sediment was expelled from the mine shaft, and what more we could expect.
  • Waikato Regional Council staff (investigators and a senior scientist) met with stakeholders to brief them on the incident, including findings to date. The council invited representation from:
    • six Hauraki iwi
    • Hauraki District Council
    • Department of Conservation
    • Ministry for the Environment
    • Waikato regional and Hauraki district councillors
    • Coromandel Watchdog of Hauraki.

Monitoring results - a summary

Image - Ohinemuri River discharge - water sampling

  • We tested for 30 heavy metals and cyanide in all the samples taken. We took samples from the stream into which the sediment was initially discharged, and the Ōhinemuri River into which that stream runs. We also took solid sediment samples.
  • Initial results showed elevated arsenic levels in the water samples of suspended sediments.
  • While arsenic was also detected in the clear flowing water, the levels were well within drinking water and ecological freshwater protection guidelines, except for a sample taken directly from the mine outlet.
  • A solid sediment sample taken from the streambank and from the mine outlet showed very high arsenic levels that would pose a human health risk if ingested.
  • The arsenic in the sediment could pose longer term risk to aquatic organisms downstream, where it may accumulate, especially to freshwater animals that live within the riverbed.
  • The next most significant metal detected in the solid sediment sample was antimony. While at elevated levels, its risk to human health is much lower compared to the arsenic.
  • Arsenic and antimony occur naturally and are commonly found in mine working waste, as a result of the mining process.
  • High iron in the sediment accounts for the bright orange colour, and the presence of high iron helps mitigate the toxicity of arsenic (reduces its bioavailability considerably).
  • Dissolved cobalt, nickel and thallium were found to be elevated above freshwater protective guidelines in the mine outlet and the stream.
  • Copper and zinc were also identified as being elevated in the stream samples, but at levels similar as to what could be seen in urban stormwater.
  • Mercury was not detected in the water samples but was detected in a sample of the solid sediment at a level below sediment guidelines and way below any human health guidelines.
  • Cyanide, which was often used to help separate out the gold and silver from the mined minerals, was not detected in any of the water samples but was detected in a sediment sample collected from the mine outlet at a level way below any human health guidelines.
  • The results also showed that the water is not very acidic, which also reduces the concern around short term effects on fish.
  • The results from water samples collected from the Ohinemuri River on the Monday after the event showed that all metal levels were back to normal. (Samples downstream were compared to water samples taken upstream of the contamination site). 
  • Sediments at the mine outlet and along the bed and banks of the stream will still pose an ongoing risk to human health due to the elevated arsenic. Avoid contact with these sediments!

      Effects on people, fish and living organisms

      • Fish are not expected to have been significantly affected by arsenic in the river due to the short-term nature of the discharge, and because the arsenic was only high in the sediment-suspended river water. We have had no reports of dead fish. Arsenic in the sediment is also strongly bound to iron, so less easily adsorbed.
      • Sediments will have settled out, mostly downriver where there are lower flows. High pH and low oxygen levels will be required for significant release of arsenic from the sediments.
      • Benthic organisms living within the sediments are more likely to have been affected.
      • Arsenic typically converts to a less toxic organic form if consumed by fish (unlike mercury).
      • In humans, arsenic is excreted reasonably rapidly and doesn’t tend to accumulate.
      • The main risk to humans will be direct ingestion of contaminated sediments. Avoid contact with sediments!

      Ongoing monitoring

      • Waikato Regional Council undertakes monthly sampling just downstream of Karangahake and the results of this monthly monitoring will help identify any long-term or ongoing impacts from the discharge.
      • Waikato Regional Council also undertakes monitoring in the Waihou River at Kopu and monitors sediment in the Firth of Thames, which will also help identify any long-term impacts from the discharge.
      • A NIWA macroinvertebrates monitoring site in Ōhinemuri could also help identify any longer-term impacts.

      Frequently asked questions